The belief that science provides the best way of investigating, understanding, and predicting everything that is that can possibly be known. This belief is incompatible with radical empiricism. Modern science certainly has demonstrated its ability to allow us to understand nature in many ways, but this fact alone does not necessarily imply that there is nothing that can be known from some method other than science and at the same time cannot be known from science alone.

Is scientism true? Is radical empiricism true? Are both theories wrong? Please let your voice be heard in the forum.

The Enlightened Worldview Project

Using modern phenomenology

to make sense of consciousness,

to establish a solid foundation for morality,

to answer the question of ultimate explanation,

and other great questions of life